Fred McGriff 1994 Upper Deck |
McGriff, on the other hand, was neither accused nor even suspected of PED use, though playing in the Steroid Era with his PED using peers has not only minimized his accomplishments but has also devalued his impressive statistics. Unfortunately, due to all the attention given to the PED using sluggers of the Steroid Era and their tarnished achievements, McGriff's Hall of Fame candidacy has become somewhat of an afterthought to most voters, as after three years on the ballot, McGriff himself has yet to eclipse 25% of the vote. And with his vote totals likely to stagnate in the next few years due to a glut of impressive and controversial candidates set to join an already crowded ballot, McGriff obviously has a long but not insurmountable road ahead of him to be elected. However, had he played in any other era, would McGriff have had this hard a time gaining support for his Hall of Fame candidacy?
Willie McCovey and Willie Stargell 1978 Topps |
There is no way to truly know how a player would have fared had they played in
another era. It is impossible to know
how factors from different eras would alter a player's performance. Based on Baseball Reference's Similarity Scores Method originally introduced by Bill James, the sluggers with the two most
similar career statistics to McGriff are Hall of Famers Willie McCovey and
Willie Stargell, while another Hall of Famer's career, Billy Williams, is
ranked eighth most similar to McGriff's. McCovey, like McGriff, was a
first baseman, Stargell split his career between left field and first, and
Williams was a left fielder. While
McGriff played most of his career in a high scoring, hitter friendly era,
McCovey, Stargell, and Williams were prominent power hitters during the low
scoring 1960's and early 1970's, a time period often referred to as the
"Second Deadball Era." When
directly compared to players from the same generation, who started their
careers within five years of them, Stargell and McCovey stand tall, ranking
third and fourth in career home runs, while Williams and McGriff check in
seventh and ninth. However, the sluggers
ahead of McGriff in his own era read like a roll call sheet for accused and
proven PED users. And, if we remove
those players from the list, McGriff's totals look much more impressive with
the slugger moving comfortably into fourth:
Top 10 Career HRs of Players Who Started Their
|
Top 10 Career HRs of Players Who Started Their
|
|||||||||||
Career's Between '81-'91
|
Career's Between '81-'91
|
|||||||||||
accused and proven PED users are highlighted in red
|
minus accused and proven PED users
|
|||||||||||
Player
|
Career
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
HR titles
|
Player
|
Career
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
HR titles
|
|||
1
|
Bonds
|
86-07
|
762
|
181
|
2
|
1
|
Griffey
|
89-10
|
630
|
136
|
4
|
|
2
|
Griffey
|
89-10
|
630
|
136
|
4
|
2
|
Thome
|
91-**
|
604
|
147
|
1
|
|
3
|
Sosa
|
89-07
|
609
|
128
|
2
|
3
|
Thomas
|
90-08
|
521
|
156
|
0
|
|
4
|
Thome
|
91-**
|
604
|
147
|
1
|
4
|
McGriff
|
86-04
|
493
|
134
|
2
|
|
5
|
McGwire
|
86-01
|
583
|
163
|
4
|
5
|
Bagwell
|
91-05
|
449
|
149
|
0
|
|
6
|
Palmeiro
|
86-05
|
569
|
132
|
0
|
6
|
Galarraga
|
85-04
|
399
|
119
|
1
|
|
7
|
Thomas
|
90-08
|
521
|
156
|
0
|
7
|
Walker
|
89-05
|
383
|
141
|
1
|
|
8
|
Sheffield
|
88-09
|
509
|
140
|
0
|
8
|
Belle
|
89-00
|
381
|
144
|
1
|
|
9
|
McGriff
|
86-04
|
493
|
134
|
2
|
9
|
Gaetti
|
81-00
|
360
|
97
|
0
|
|
10
|
Canseco
|
85-01
|
462
|
132
|
2
|
10
|
G Vaughn
|
89-03
|
355
|
113
|
0
|
|
**Thome's stats through 2011
|
**Thome's stats through 2011
|
|||||||||||
Top 10 Career HRs of Players Who Started Their
|
Top 10 Career HRs of Players Who Started Their
|
|||||||||||
Career's Between '54-'64
|
Career's Between '57-'67
|
|||||||||||
Player
|
Career
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
HR titles
|
Player
|
Career
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
HR titles
|
|||
1
|
Aaron
|
54-76
|
755
|
155
|
4
|
1
|
R Jackson
|
67-87
|
563
|
139
|
4
|
|
2
|
Robinson
|
56-76
|
586
|
154
|
1
|
2
|
McCovey
|
59-80
|
521
|
147
|
3
|
|
3
|
Killebrew
|
54-75
|
573
|
143
|
6
|
3
|
Stargell
|
62-82
|
475
|
147
|
2
|
|
4
|
McCovey
|
59-80
|
521
|
147
|
3
|
4
|
Yaz
|
61-83
|
452
|
130
|
1
|
|
5
|
Stargell
|
62-82
|
475
|
147
|
2
|
5
|
Williams
|
59-76
|
426
|
133
|
0
|
|
6
|
Yaz
|
61-83
|
452
|
130
|
1
|
6
|
Nettles*
|
67-88
|
390
|
110
|
1
|
|
7
|
Williams
|
59-76
|
426
|
133
|
0
|
7
|
Bench
|
67-83
|
389
|
126
|
2
|
|
8
|
Howard*
|
58-73
|
382
|
142
|
2
|
8
|
Howard*
|
58-73
|
382
|
142
|
2
|
|
9
|
Cepeda
|
58-74
|
379
|
133
|
1
|
9
|
Cepeda
|
58-74
|
379
|
133
|
1
|
|
9
|
Perez
|
64-86
|
379
|
122
|
0
|
10
|
Perez
|
64-86
|
379
|
122
|
0
|
|
*Frank Howard is only non-HOFer among top 10
|
*Nettles & Howard are only non-HOFers among top 10
|
Baseball Reference also has another interesting tool called Neutralized Batting which measures how a player's career statistics would look if you convert their stats into a certain year, league, and home ballpark. When McGriff's 1986-2004 career is placed into McCovey's 1959-1980* ('59-'77 for McGriff since he played 19 seasons versus McCovey's 22) career span with McCovey's home ballparks, McGriff's totals decrease in every counting stat except for games and hits since he would not have lost nearly half a season's worth of games due to the 1994-1995 strike:
G
|
R
|
H
|
HR
|
RBI
|
BA
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
|
McCovey
|
2588
|
1229
|
2211
|
521
|
1555
|
0.270
|
0.374
|
0.515
|
0.889
|
McGriff
|
2505
|
1257
|
2393
|
478
|
1440
|
0.273
|
0.363
|
0.490
|
0.853
|
*McGriff 59-77: 59 Seals Stadium, 60-73, 77 Candlestick, 74-76 San Diego Stadium
|
When you put McGriff's career into Stargell's '62-'82* span,
you actually get almost the same results as you do with McCovey:
G
|
R
|
H
|
HR
|
RBI
|
BA
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
|
Stargell
|
2360
|
1195
|
2232
|
475
|
1540
|
0.282
|
0.360
|
0.529
|
0.889
|
McGriff
|
2517
|
1252
|
2396
|
477
|
1436
|
0.272
|
0.362
|
0.488
|
0.850
|
*McGriff 62-80: 62-69 Forbes Field, 70 Forbes/3 Rivers, 71-80
Three Rivers Stadium
|
However, when you do the same thing with Williams' '59-'76* career, McGriff takes less of a hit since he would benefit from playing his home games at Wrigley Field--a notorious hitter's park where Williams hit 231 of his 426 career home runs--and finishes with almost the exact same career numbers as he did in his actual '86-'04 career:
G
|
R
|
H
|
HR
|
RBI
|
BA
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
|
Williams
|
2488
|
1410
|
2711
|
426
|
1475
|
0.290
|
0.361
|
0.492
|
0.853
|
McGriff
|
2505
|
1326
|
2481
|
493
|
1525
|
0.280
|
0.371
|
0.502
|
0.873
|
*McGriff 59-77: 59-74 Wrigley Field, 75-77 Oakland Coliseum
|
|||||||||
McGriff^
|
2460
|
1349
|
2490
|
493
|
1550
|
0.284
|
0.377
|
0.509
|
0.886
|
^Actual McGriff 86-04 career totals
|
Billy Williams 1964 Topps |
McCovey and Stargell, both winners of a NL MVP trophy and owners of a 147
career OPS+, were more dominant sluggers than McGriff and Williams whose OPS+ were
134 and 133, respectively. Although
their careers were a little shorter in length than McCovey and Stargell's,
McGriff and Williams' were noteworthy for their durability. McGriff played 150 or more games in a season
ten times and 140 or more three times--not counting the strike shortened '94
and '95 seasons where he was on pace to play over 150 games, while Williams
reached 150 games in thirteen seasons and 140 in one other. By contrast, McCovey only reached 150 games
four times and 140 three times, while Stargell never had a season in which he
played 150 games and just six where he reached 140. Both McCovey and Stargell courageously
battled back from their injuries time and time again, allowing them to have
long careers and earn them the milestones that helped make them first ballot
Hall of Famers. However, McCovey and
Stargell's recurring injuries forced their teams to play a replacement level
player such as Gary Thomasson or Jose Pagan in place of their ailing star. Conversely, McGriff didn't spend a day on the
disabled list until his last full season in 2003, while from 1963 to 1970
Williams played in 1,117 consecutive games, the sixth longest such streak in
MLB history.
Some writers and fans have inaccurately labeled McGriff as a "compiler" and say that the slender slugger owes his impressive career numbers to longevity rather than excellence. Others say his stats don't quite measure up in the era he played. McGriff's career stats are a byproduct of consistency, durability, and excellence--not just longevity. There are few players in baseball history as consistent as McGriff, who for 16-straight seasons, from 1987 to 2002, hit no less than 19 home runs and in 10 of those seasons hit 30 or more. In contrast to sluggers like McCovey and Stargell, "Crime Dog" could be counted on for his durability. In fact, McGriff ranks third all-time with 2,239 games played at first. As far as excellence goes, from 1988 to 1994, McGriff averaged 35 home runs, 95 RBIs, a .288 batting average, .390 OBP, and 155 OPS+. Moreover, during that seven year span, McGriff won three Silver Slugger Awards, finished in the top 4 in homers each year in his respective league--leading the AL in 1989 and NL in 1992--and led all of baseball with 242 homers.
Some writers and fans have inaccurately labeled McGriff as a "compiler" and say that the slender slugger owes his impressive career numbers to longevity rather than excellence. Others say his stats don't quite measure up in the era he played. McGriff's career stats are a byproduct of consistency, durability, and excellence--not just longevity. There are few players in baseball history as consistent as McGriff, who for 16-straight seasons, from 1987 to 2002, hit no less than 19 home runs and in 10 of those seasons hit 30 or more. In contrast to sluggers like McCovey and Stargell, "Crime Dog" could be counted on for his durability. In fact, McGriff ranks third all-time with 2,239 games played at first. As far as excellence goes, from 1988 to 1994, McGriff averaged 35 home runs, 95 RBIs, a .288 batting average, .390 OBP, and 155 OPS+. Moreover, during that seven year span, McGriff won three Silver Slugger Awards, finished in the top 4 in homers each year in his respective league--leading the AL in 1989 and NL in 1992--and led all of baseball with 242 homers.
Top 5 HRs 1988 to 1994
|
Top 5 HRs 1995 to 2002
|
|||||||
Player
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
Player
|
HRs
|
OPS+
|
|||
1
|
McGriff
|
242
|
155
|
1
|
Sosa
|
404
|
148
|
|
2
|
Bonds
|
218
|
170
|
2
|
Bonds
|
354
|
197
|
|
3
|
Carter
|
213
|
111
|
3
|
McGwire
|
345
|
183
|
|
4
|
Canseco
|
207
|
148
|
4
|
Palmeiro
|
335
|
140
|
|
5
|
Fielder
|
197
|
130
|
5
|
Thome
|
304
|
159
|
Fred McGriff 2000 Fleer Tradition |
Had McGriff played in the "Second Deadball Era" in McCovey, Stargell, or Williams' career span, he would have retired after the 1977 or 1980 season and would have first been eligible to appear on the Hall of Fame ballot in '83 or '86. McCovey and Stargell both made it into the Hall of Fame on their first try, with McCovey picking up 81.4% of the vote on the '86 ballot and Stargell collecting 82.4% on the '88 ballot. Williams didn't have quite as easy a road, making his debut on a very crowded '82 ballot that included fellow first time nominees Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson. Aaron and Robinson were easily elected with 97.8% and 89.2% of the vote, while Williams drew just 23.4%. The following year, Williams' support jumped to 40.9% and continued to rise, about 10% a year, until he was voted in on his sixth ballot in 1987 with 85.7% of the vote.
Based on Baseball Reference's Neutralizer link, McGriff's career numbers translated into the "Second Deadball Era" would have been just a tick below McCovey and Stargell's but right on par with or slightly better than Williams'. One drawback of the Neutralizer link is that it does seem to understate the effects of the "Second Deadball Era" on McGriff's home run totals. Though, I think we can safely assume that had McGriff played during the "Second Deadball Era" at McCovey or Stargell's home ballparks, he would have hit around 450 or 475 homers with a batting average in the low to mid .270s, and probably been elected to the Hall of Fame somewhere around his fifth or sixth ballot. And, had McGriff, like Williams, spent most of his home games aiming for the stands above the ivy covered brick walls of Wrigley, he likely would have hit just under 500 longballs with a batting average around .280, and rather easily been voted into Cooperstown--possibly on his first ballot. Unfortunately, McGriff spent his career playing alongside the PED users of the Steroid Era who made a mockery of the home run and now has the misfortune of being overshadowed by those same PED users on the Hall of Fame ballot.
----by John Tuberty
Related Articles:
Jeff Bagwell, Fred McGriff, The Hall of Fame, and 400 Home Runs
No comments:
Post a Comment